Friday, April 3, 2009

Hide your guns because Binghamton, NY

Today April 3rd @ 10:30am, A distressed unsettled individual begin to commit mass murder in the American Civic Association building in Binghamton, NY. This act of evil not only killed 13 people and critically injured 4 but may have just set off a full war against all guns (including hunting rifles). The Vice President and President have a history of being anti gun. In fact Obama has said he supported DC's gun ban and in Illinois as a State Senator endorsed a 500% tax in increase on firearms and ammo.



The Vice President Biden (not a pro-gun supporter) when trying to describe what has happen stated (when a bone flew out his mouth)"...I think it is time we uh, we got to figure a way to deal with this senseless, senseless violence."



Now if you read in between the single sentence and Biden's history of opening up his mouth and saying too much he is basically saying this,



All the truth out of what happen today as tragic as it is, If somebody at that institution had a concealed carry permit they could have defended those innocent people who were trying to become citizens the right way. The murderer purchased a gun license under the name 'Wong' too purchase and own a handguns in Broome County, New York under a different name then his Drivers License had 'Voong'. Sounds like somebody screwed up right?

link to news story:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/hostage_shooting

I believe with the murders in; Samson, Alabama, Oakland and Santa Clara, California, as well as North Carolina. The 2nd Amendment will be under full attack. Something to keep in mind when looking at all of these horrific crimes did the killers legally own these firearms? My guess the answer to this will be NO. I am not saying some bad apples aren't in the barrel, but you don't throw the baby out with the bath water because the water is cold. You issue the licenses and make sure these people are who they said they were. Don't take away a legal law bidding citizens right because you can't do your own job. You have plenty of laws in the books all ready why not enforce the current laws before you try to make new ones. If you want the make laws how about making a country wide concealed permit and I am sure us Pro Gun Individuals (cause some democrats are pro gun too) don't mind a background check at gun shows if it is done in a manner where you can ensure its instant but thorough. In Washington State you can purchase a handgun and walk out the door within minutes if you have a concealed carry license and check out. That is the way I believe it should be I believe to keep nuts away from guns (which will never happen when you have Mexico shipping drugs and illegal guns to thugs and drug dealers.)

If they ban guns then whats next? Here is a look at your Bill of Rights:
  1. Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
  2. A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.
  3. No soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.
  4. The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
  5. No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
  6. In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense.
  7. In suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise reexamined in any court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.
  8. Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.
  9. The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.
  10. The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people.
Go ahead and pick the next Right you want lose after they get done taking away your Right to Bear Arms, because this won't be the first right you lose guarantee.

1 comment: